With this statement, Maria Luisa Busi leaves the conduct of the Tg1 Minzolini. She writes in a letter he posted on the board of editors.
to Dr. Augusto Minzolini
the CDR
PC Dr. Paul Garimberti
pc Prof. Mauro Masi
pc Dr. Luciano FLOWS
Dear Editor,
you ask to be relieved from the task of conducting the 20th edition of Tg1, having determined that a situation does not allow me to perform this task without prejudice to my professional beliefs.
This is' a difficult choice for me, but obligatory.
consider the editorial that you wanted to give the paper a sort of a diversion, because of which the TG1 is likely to crash into a permanent loss of credibility 'in respect of viewers.
As the president of the Vigilance Commission RAI Sergio Zavoli: "the bigger Italian texts, giving up its traditional structure has seen transform together with its identity ', a traditional part of listening."
I love this newspaper, where I work for 21 years. 'Cause a great newspaper. It 'was the sale of newspaper, Frajese, Longhi, Morrione, Fava, Giuntella. Il giornale delle culture diverse, delle idee diverse. Le conteneva tutte, era questa la sua ricchezza. Era il loro giornale, il nostro giornale. Anche dei colleghi che hai rimosso dai loro incarichi e di molti altri qui dentro che sono stati emarginati.
Questo e’ il giornale che ha sempre parlato a tutto il Paese. Il giornale degli italiani. Il giornale che ha dato voce a tutte le voci. Non e’ mai stato il giornale di una voce sola.
Oggi l’informazione del TG1 e’ un’informazione parziale e di parte.
Dov’e’ il paese reale? Dove sono le donne della vita reale? Quelle che devono aspettare mesi per una mammografia, se non possono pagarla? Quelle coi wages worst in Europe, those who are struggling every day to go 'cause there's no nursery' place for all our children? must be to raise the blood and die for the honor of one of our title. And where are the women and men who have lost their jobs? A million people, behind which are their families.
Where are the young, for the first time with a worse future of the fathers? And the forty still precarious, 800 euro per month, which can not even buy a couch, let alone giving birth to a child? And where are the cassintegrati Alitalia? What happened? And hundreds of companies and entrepreneurs that are closing the northeast who commit suicide because ' failed? Where
'that Italy we have a duty to tell? That Italy exists. But the TG1 has dropped. Also I buy toilet paper for my daughter who attends first grade in a public school. But that evening, the TG1 of 20, we give space only to ministers and Gelmini Brunetta presenting the new great project for the digitization of the school, including a digital whiteboard.
Italy experiencing a crisis in social and 'over the siding of our indifference. Squeezed between information of a party - an editorial on justice, one against the repentant Mafia, another on the investigation of Trani in which you said not to be investigated, belied by the facts the next day - el'infotainment newspaper: how many times should wash their hands every day, hunting the crocodile in the lake, the antiscippo underpants.
An editorial choice with which we are enriching the scripts of the programs of satire and impoverishing our reputation as the first newspaper of the public service of the most 'important company in the country's cultural.
addition to citizens, they are paying for so many good colleagues who could devote more satisfaction surveys to many other more 'high profile and interest.
A journalist has a unique tool to defend their professional beliefs: to raise his signature piece.
A conductor, a conductor, puo’ soltanto levare la propria faccia, a questo punto. Nell’affidamento dei telespettatori e’ infatti al conduttore che viene ricollegata la notizia. E’ lui che ricopre primariamente il ruolo di garante del rapporto di fiducia che sussiste con i telespettatori.
I fatti dell’Aquila ne sono stata la prova.
Quando centinaia di persone hanno inveito contro la troupe che guidavo al grido di vergogna e scodinzolini, ho capito che quel rapporto di fiducia che ci ha sempre legato al nostro pubblico era davvero compromesso. E’ quello che accade quando si privilegia la comunicazione all’informazione, la propaganda alla verifica. Un’ultima annotazione piu’ personale.
Ho fatto dell’onesta’ e della lealta’ lo stile della mia vita e della mia professione.
Dissentire non e’ tradire. Non rammento chi lo ha detto recentemente.
Pertanto:1) respingo l’accusa di avere avuto un comportamento scorretto.
Le critiche che ho espresso pubblicamente - ricordo che si tratta di un mio diritto oltre che di un dovere essendo una consigliera della FNSI - le avevo gia’ mosse anche nelle riunioni di sommario e a te, personalmente. Con spirito di leale collaborazione, pensando che in un lavoro come il nostro la circolazione delle idee e la pluralita’ delle opinioni costituisca un arricchimento.
Per questo ho continuato a condurre in questi mesi. Ma e’ palese che non c’e’ piu’ alcuno spazio for the democratic process to TG1.
are the times of the single thought. Who is there and 'out, sooner or later.
2) reject the accusation that I 'move was biting the hand that feeds.
I remember the food and 'that of a simple left, which simply asks that the dish contains the right ingredients. All honest. And I want to clarify that you have always refused compensation out of the Rai, lavishly offered by large companies for the faces called to present their conventions, believing that a reporter from the public service should not profit from their role.
3) reject as insulting statements in your letter after the interview with Republic, letter in which you called the company a disciplinary action against me: I've been accused of "damaging the newspaper I work for, with my statements on the data of listening.
data made publicly confirmed those statements. I also find it ironic
your consideration the following: "give the TG1 'account of the views of minorities, but not shocked' the facts in deference to ideological campaigns." I can tell you that the only campaign to which I devote myself and 'the one where I spend the weekends with his family. I hope you can say the same. Conversely I have noticed that has not raised a word against your violent smear campaign that the newspaper Il Giornale, Free and the weekly Panorama - even using improperly business mail me direct - have lined up against me after my criticism of your editorial. An attack on clock: immediately discredit those who disagree to weaken the value of its claims. I have been called "shear ciacolante - talkative girl - reporter without news, without editorial columnist" and so on. Not
's what I said handing the President Ciampi Saint Vincent Prize for journalism, the Quirinale.
respond to these cowards' my office.
But know that it is not 'sure why I leave the conduct of 20. Thomas Bernhard writes in Old Masters dozens of times a word that I love very much: we live rispetto.Non of admiration, he says, but 'we bisogno.Caro Director of respect, I believe we need more respect. For news, the public, for the truth '. What I feel for the history of TG1, for my company, leads me to this decision. Respect for viewers, our single point of contact. We should always remember. You would have a duty too.
This is' a difficult choice for me, but obligatory.
consider the editorial that you wanted to give the paper a sort of a diversion, because of which the TG1 is likely to crash into a permanent loss of credibility 'in respect of viewers.
As the president of the Vigilance Commission RAI Sergio Zavoli: "the bigger Italian texts, giving up its traditional structure has seen transform together with its identity ', a traditional part of listening."
I love this newspaper, where I work for 21 years. 'Cause a great newspaper. It 'was the sale of newspaper, Frajese, Longhi, Morrione, Fava, Giuntella. Il giornale delle culture diverse, delle idee diverse. Le conteneva tutte, era questa la sua ricchezza. Era il loro giornale, il nostro giornale. Anche dei colleghi che hai rimosso dai loro incarichi e di molti altri qui dentro che sono stati emarginati.
Questo e’ il giornale che ha sempre parlato a tutto il Paese. Il giornale degli italiani. Il giornale che ha dato voce a tutte le voci. Non e’ mai stato il giornale di una voce sola.
Oggi l’informazione del TG1 e’ un’informazione parziale e di parte.
Dov’e’ il paese reale? Dove sono le donne della vita reale? Quelle che devono aspettare mesi per una mammografia, se non possono pagarla? Quelle coi wages worst in Europe, those who are struggling every day to go 'cause there's no nursery' place for all our children? must be to raise the blood and die for the honor of one of our title. And where are the women and men who have lost their jobs? A million people, behind which are their families.
Where are the young, for the first time with a worse future of the fathers? And the forty still precarious, 800 euro per month, which can not even buy a couch, let alone giving birth to a child? And where are the cassintegrati Alitalia? What happened? And hundreds of companies and entrepreneurs that are closing the northeast who commit suicide because ' failed? Where
'that Italy we have a duty to tell? That Italy exists. But the TG1 has dropped. Also I buy toilet paper for my daughter who attends first grade in a public school. But that evening, the TG1 of 20, we give space only to ministers and Gelmini Brunetta presenting the new great project for the digitization of the school, including a digital whiteboard.
Italy experiencing a crisis in social and 'over the siding of our indifference. Squeezed between information of a party - an editorial on justice, one against the repentant Mafia, another on the investigation of Trani in which you said not to be investigated, belied by the facts the next day - el'infotainment newspaper: how many times should wash their hands every day, hunting the crocodile in the lake, the antiscippo underpants.
An editorial choice with which we are enriching the scripts of the programs of satire and impoverishing our reputation as the first newspaper of the public service of the most 'important company in the country's cultural.
addition to citizens, they are paying for so many good colleagues who could devote more satisfaction surveys to many other more 'high profile and interest.
A journalist has a unique tool to defend their professional beliefs: to raise his signature piece.
A conductor, a conductor, puo’ soltanto levare la propria faccia, a questo punto. Nell’affidamento dei telespettatori e’ infatti al conduttore che viene ricollegata la notizia. E’ lui che ricopre primariamente il ruolo di garante del rapporto di fiducia che sussiste con i telespettatori.
I fatti dell’Aquila ne sono stata la prova.
Quando centinaia di persone hanno inveito contro la troupe che guidavo al grido di vergogna e scodinzolini, ho capito che quel rapporto di fiducia che ci ha sempre legato al nostro pubblico era davvero compromesso. E’ quello che accade quando si privilegia la comunicazione all’informazione, la propaganda alla verifica. Un’ultima annotazione piu’ personale.
Ho fatto dell’onesta’ e della lealta’ lo stile della mia vita e della mia professione.
Dissentire non e’ tradire. Non rammento chi lo ha detto recentemente.
Pertanto:1) respingo l’accusa di avere avuto un comportamento scorretto.
Le critiche che ho espresso pubblicamente - ricordo che si tratta di un mio diritto oltre che di un dovere essendo una consigliera della FNSI - le avevo gia’ mosse anche nelle riunioni di sommario e a te, personalmente. Con spirito di leale collaborazione, pensando che in un lavoro come il nostro la circolazione delle idee e la pluralita’ delle opinioni costituisca un arricchimento.
Per questo ho continuato a condurre in questi mesi. Ma e’ palese che non c’e’ piu’ alcuno spazio for the democratic process to TG1.
are the times of the single thought. Who is there and 'out, sooner or later.
2) reject the accusation that I 'move was biting the hand that feeds.
I remember the food and 'that of a simple left, which simply asks that the dish contains the right ingredients. All honest. And I want to clarify that you have always refused compensation out of the Rai, lavishly offered by large companies for the faces called to present their conventions, believing that a reporter from the public service should not profit from their role.
3) reject as insulting statements in your letter after the interview with Republic, letter in which you called the company a disciplinary action against me: I've been accused of "damaging the newspaper I work for, with my statements on the data of listening.
data made publicly confirmed those statements. I also find it ironic
your consideration the following: "give the TG1 'account of the views of minorities, but not shocked' the facts in deference to ideological campaigns." I can tell you that the only campaign to which I devote myself and 'the one where I spend the weekends with his family. I hope you can say the same. Conversely I have noticed that has not raised a word against your violent smear campaign that the newspaper Il Giornale, Free and the weekly Panorama - even using improperly business mail me direct - have lined up against me after my criticism of your editorial. An attack on clock: immediately discredit those who disagree to weaken the value of its claims. I have been called "shear ciacolante - talkative girl - reporter without news, without editorial columnist" and so on. Not
's what I said handing the President Ciampi Saint Vincent Prize for journalism, the Quirinale.
respond to these cowards' my office.
But know that it is not 'sure why I leave the conduct of 20. Thomas Bernhard writes in Old Masters dozens of times a word that I love very much: we live rispetto.Non of admiration, he says, but 'we bisogno.Caro Director of respect, I believe we need more respect. For news, the public, for the truth '. What I feel for the history of TG1, for my company, leads me to this decision. Respect for viewers, our single point of contact. We should always remember. You would have a duty too.
Marialuisa Busi
Rome, May 20, 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment